The evidence presented in the protracted rape and human trafficking trial of Nigerian pastor Timothy Omotoso demonstrates a clear pattern of behaviour on the part of the accused.
This is the sentiment of state advocate Joel Cesar, who presented his argument in the Gqeberha High Court on Tuesday, on why Omotoso and his co-accused should stand trial and not be set free.
Omotoso's co-accused are Zukiswa Sitho and Lusanda Sulani.
Cesar's argument came in response to the application by defence attorney Peter Daubermann - in terms of Section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Act - for his client's discharge.
"Vulnerable and attractive young women were exploited, recruited, groomed, and eventually sexually assaulted and or raped by Omotoso," Cesar said.
According to him, there was no evidence before the court that the previous state prosecutor, advocate Nceba Ntelwa, suggested to certain state witnesses that they should perjure themselves.
The state conceded that the accused should be discharged on the 30 charges that they did not lead evidence on.
"We do however oppose their release on the remainder of the 36 charges.
"The evidence of all the complainants who testified was thoroughly tested through cross-examination."
Cesar also said a prima facie case has been made against the accused.
Judge Irma Schoeman will make her ruling public on 31 October.
